I want to give a disclaimer right off the bat on this one…
This is not a hard news article.
This is not a conspiracy theory article.
It’s just…some musings.
Fair enough?
Just something I wanted to throw out there and see what everyone thinks and perhaps there’s a really obvious story explaining this that I just can’t find.
Ok here we go…
Long before Charlie Kirk was assassinated, I always found it really weird that his Twitter/X handle was @CharlieKirk11.

Anyone else ever notice that or find it weird?
A man with 6+ million followers and he can’t even get the @CharlieKirk handle?
I have searched and searched and can’t really find anyone discussing it or any explanation for why Charlie would have chosen that handle with that number.
Obviously, the reason he doesn’t have just @CharlieKirk is because that was taken one year earlier in September 2010:

But that account is obviously dead.
It follows no one.
It has never posted.
And Charlie had obvious connections, he interacted with Elon Musk on more than one occasion, surely he could have just asked Elon for the @CharlieKirk handle and I’m sure he could have gotten it.
But the bigger question is why choose “11”?
Looking at some obvious ideas, it’s not tied to his birthday which is October 14, 1993.
It’s not tied to his age when he started Turning Point USA (that was age 18).
It COULD be tied to the year he joined Twitter which was May 2011, and kind of like we all did when email first came out and we would often put the current year in our email address and then we all realized later on that was kind of a bad idea? It could be as simple as that:

Obviously, the number “11” is known as a “master number” in occult numerology, but I reject the idea that Charlie Kirk was some sort of secret Mason.
I just don’t buy that for one second.
But still the mystery is a bit odd.
A man with 6+ million followers on X couldn’t get his name without having to stick “11” to the end of it?
Something Elon Musk easily could have fixed for him?
Anyway, Charlie was obviously prolific on video and on X, so if he’s explained the “11” at some point and you can point me to it, please post in the Comments! I’d love to see the answer.
Here’s the only part of this article where I will dip my toe into “conspiracy theory” land…
11 sure does look a lot like 1 + 1 which is also known as…..SNAKE EYES, do I have that correct?

What are the odds?
Another “Snake Eyes” connection hidden in plain sight?

Leave a Comment