Folks, I have been trying to put my finger on what happened to Tucker Carlson for quite a while.
Because something happened.
Millions of conservatives once watched Tucker every night on Fox News. Healthy disagreement inside a political movement is fine, especially over war and foreign policy.
But Tucker has moved far beyond disagreement.
He has planted himself alongside a group of former MAGA allies who appear determined to tear down President Trump, fracture the Republican coalition and build something new in its place.
And Victor Davis Hanson just gave the clearest explanation I have heard yet for why it happened.
According to Axios, Carlson hosted Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, Joe Kent and others at his home in Maine shortly before unveiling a ten-point vision for America. The group discussed a new political movement and reportedly urged Carlson to consider a 2028 presidential run.
Carlson stopped short of formally launching a party or announcing a candidacy. But the manifesto followed his public promise to help build a third party, and he described his ten points as a foundation for whatever political order comes next.
The plan calls for fairness, sovereignty, productivity, beauty, health, honesty, optimism, wisdom, decency and unity. Beneath those labels are proposals involving border enforcement, American manufacturing, food and health policy, government transparency, foreign influence, immigration and military policy.
The White House answered by calling Carlson’s circle a collection of turncoats who overestimate their influence. President Trump, it said, remains the unquestioned leader of the Republican Party and the MAGA movement.
Here is Tucker presenting that manifesto:
Hanson spotted the contradiction immediately: most of Tucker’s supposedly new agenda is already being advanced by President Trump.
Border security. Law and order.
Rebuilding American production. Cleaning up the food supply.
Challenging entrenched institutions. Rejecting DEI. Putting the country first.
So why try to destroy the one political coalition actually moving those ideas?
That is where Hanson cuts through all the noise.
He says the project is politically incoherent. If Tucker’s new party pulled votes from the Republican nominee in 2028, it would not usher in a purer version of America First.
It could hand power to the very Democrats who oppose nearly everything Tucker claims to want.
Hanson walks through the history. Theodore Roosevelt’s third-party run helped Woodrow Wilson win in 1912.
Ross Perot complicated Republican hopes in the 1990s. Ralph Nader’s Green Party run became part of the razor-thin math surrounding Florida in 2000.
The lesson is brutally simple: third parties rarely win the White House. They usually damage the major party closest to them.
Marjorie Taylor Greene called the Maine gathering the beginning of a new movement:
But Hanson believes the real fuel here is personal grievance.
Tucker once had extraordinary access to President Trump. He traveled with him, spoke with him directly and enjoyed the kind of proximity to power almost nobody gets.
Then came the break over Iran and Israel.
Hanson’s theory is that all that access created a false sense of influence. Tucker apparently believed the president should take his call, accept his advice and change course.
When President Trump did not, political disagreement curdled into something much uglier.
Watch Tucker discuss that falling-out earlier this year:
And then there is Israel.
Hanson argues that anti-Israel hostility has become one of the faction’s organizing forces. In his view, the obsession has grown so consuming that it now overrides political math, gratitude, shared domestic priorities and the danger of returning the radical Left to power.
In a transcript published by The Daily Signal, Hanson described Carlson’s political project as a potential spoiler operation. He said its most likely practical effect would be to hurt President Trump’s eventual successor in the 2028 election.
Hanson compared Carlson’s ten-point platform with the Trump Administration’s record and found the overwhelming majority of it already represented inside MAGA.
He pointed specifically to border enforcement, law and order, opposition to DEI and the food and health agenda led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
He then turned to the people gathered around Carlson. Hanson argued that several had once benefited from President Trump’s endorsements, access or appointments, but became bitter after political disagreements or personal setbacks.
Finally, Hanson said hostility toward Israel and antisemitic anger are helping bind the faction together. He warned that their project could damage the agenda they recently called essential while delivering power to opponents who reject almost all of it.
I think Hanson nailed it.
Tucker did not suddenly discover that President Trump was governing like Joe Biden. He did not uncover some massive domestic-policy betrayal that made the Democrats a better option.
He stopped getting his way.
And instead of using his enormous platform to argue his case while helping preserve the only viable America First coalition in the country, he now appears willing to burn that coalition down.
Call it what it is.
Ego dressed up as ideology.
Watch the full video here:
Leave a Comment